Baby Storm with father, David Stocker.
A Toronto couple decided to conceal the gender of
their child in order to keep him/her open to the option of selecting its own
gender. Parents, Kathy
Witterick and David Stocker have named their child Storm and are keeping their
baby's upbringing gender neutral in all aspects ranging from its name to its clothing.
Although the child is born a certain way biologically which is its sex, the
parents want the infant to choose for itself what gender he/she feels
comfortable in. Their reasoning behind this is that they don’t want the world’s gender roles to define their child’s
personality.
I feel that this couple is making their child a social experiment by
taking away its identity. Humans are either classified as male, female,
transgender or another categorized being. By denying their child the label of a
classification which is from Mother Nature is insensible. I don’t understand
how they feel that a child will decide what gender he/she wants to be when they
have been created with the body parts of one gender. If Storm has a vagina
she’s a female and if a penis it is a male, simple as that. This is the time
where parents have to come in and take a positive decision for the baby
because he/she is unable to decide for itself.
Social stereotypes and gender roles will always exist and the only way
to overcome that is to make sure the child’s upbringing is altered. The parents
are teaching Storm to dislike a part of her/him instead of accepting who she/he
is.
When you are born into a gender, you aren’t conforming to anything. This
classification is just a way how we distinguish people due to their sexual
organs. Your biological parts define what gender you are, not the gender roles
one chooses to participate in. For most parts, I think people are happy with the sexual organs they are born with which defines their sex. The only thing they oppose is that gender roles which society attaches to each sex. Looking at the story from the parents' perspective I can see why they made such a decision but I think that they shouldn't deny Storm's biological reality. There's a place to draw a line; instead of broadcasting Storm like a no-name brand, they should raise him/her to break the stereotypical gender roles assigned to man and woman.
Watch the video from the following link it gives arguments from both
sides by the ladies from The View (TV show).
Questions:
- By not being defined as a female or male, aren’t the parents taking away the child’s identity?
- If you grow up genderless, do you think that will cause psychological and/or sociological disorders in a person? Or will it be beneficial for the individual?
- Are the parents imposing the gender free environment?
- Are you happy with your sex? Would you like to have been born the opposite sex due to society's gender roles?







.jpg)

